Post from a Scientist: “Remember the Big Picture”

Hi everyone! Happy (belated) first day of autumn! My name is Alena Malyarenko and I’m from Moscow. I wanted to go on this adventure because I was desperate to listen to people with different backgrounds, and I haven’t been disappointed. We have in this Summer School the most diverse group I’ve ever been a part of. We have people who studied theoretical Math and Physics, some of whom have gone into environmental fields later. There are people who studied Geophysics and then went into Meteorology or Oceanography. There are also biologists and people who create physical models from scratch. And here I am: I studied Oceanography from a geographical point of view, without using as much Math and Physics as others. So it’s safe to say that we all have different point of view on every topic. 😉

 After I gave my presentation about water masses from a global scale point of view, we had a very heated conversation about using math to go for precise results. The main idea of my presentation was that sometimes you don’t have to use so much math, statistics, or great models that describe every process to learn something about the ocean. You can just look at observations and results, and create a hypothesis about ocean processes. And if you have good experience in the field, your hypothesis will probably be true.

 And this idea can be spread to every area of science. In recent times, our definition of “better” has come to mean “smaller, and more numbers after the period,” instead of meaning “closer to reality.” For example, we look at brain cells, and try to find out how small parts of our bodies work. Some of us actually try to find out how water molecules interact with each other. But sometimes, in all this rush, I fell like scientists can forget about the big picture. There are like a bazillion different molecules in the world’s oceans. Not only do we not have powerful enough computers to calculate all of that, but more importantly, we don’t necessarily need it. There has to be a line drawn of sensible decisions about where to stop. Think about how oceanographers worked in the 1970s. They had a little bit of data about the ocean, but there weren’t very powerful computers for them to use, so they used their imaginations, and created some awesome techniques for analysis of ocean processes. And now we just forget about them in the rush of racing for precision. I think that it would be nice to try to combine the old methods with the new data we can get from modern instruments.

 Personal PS:  Happy Birthday to my first cousin once removed – Arseniy!!! He is 1 year old today!!! Love you!!!

And my dearest family, please answer my emails!

 NOTE TO EVERY FAMILY / FRIEND WHO DIDN’T GET AN EMAIL Check your spam folders, please!!! The address we use ends in  @rambler.ru ! We are all waiting here for your answers!

 – Alena Malyarenko

Scientists stopped to eat chocolate while deploying instruments into the ocean!
Scientists stopped to eat chocolate while deploying instruments into the ocean!
Here I am standing on the ship’s deck – tiny compared to the ship and the ice! Photos from Alena Malyarenko
Here I am standing on the ship’s deck – tiny compared to the ship and the ice!
Photos from Alena Malyarenko

4 thoughts on “Post from a Scientist: “Remember the Big Picture””

  1. Hello Linsay, I’m Christopher Bess and I reside in Miami Florida. I attend Law Enforcement Officers’ Memorial High School and I really enjoy reading your post and stories during my 6th period Physics class. I love what you said about ” not having to using math for every solution to a problem” I couldn’t agree more with you. Can you please describe a time where you encountered a problem that is normally solved by using math, however instead of using math you used another method?

    1. Hi Chris, I remember your name from the Leadership Miami trip that we did – didn’t you become the “president” of a company for a day? 🙂 Let me say one thing about math to make sure we are on the same page about that post. When that scientist was talking about using knowledge and estimates, we were talking about doing that in addition to math. When you’re doing any kind of science, you need math, but you also need creativity and experience. For example, when you’re modeling the Gulf Stream, you certainly don’t need to do the math for what every molecule of water is doing. But… you do still need to do some math to create estimates or models to predict or analyze what’s going on in the currents and weather. 🙂

      1. Thanks so much for the reply and sorry for the delay in this post. And yes thats me ! (: I also remember you as well! Will there be another event this year similar to the Leadership Miami trip last year? Thanks for clarifying the information for me, I have a better understanding now. Hope to hear from you soon !!

        1. Hi Chris! I’m glad you have a better understanding now, and I’m also happy you had a good experience in Leadership Miami this last year! We have actually been working on figuring out a way to expand the program, but we’re still working on it. It might be merged with another program in the city, but we will let your teachers know if there’s another opportunity! And in the meantime, I’m going to come visit your school when I’m back in Miami to talk about the Arctic!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *